본문으로 바로 이동 / Skip to content

PROOF 31

Prove.

The vertex of a quadratic function

On the real numbers ℝ.

A way to read this proof

First separate what is assumed from what is to be proved. At each step, ask which definition or earlier result permits the move. If it is unclear, return to that premise rather than skipping to the conclusion.

Definition D1

f(x) = ax² + bx + c (a ≠ 0) is called a quadratic function.

Proof.

(1)x² means x·x, u − v means u + (−v), and u/v means u·v⁻¹ (v ≠ 0). 2 means 1 + 1, and 4 means 2 × 2.convention
(2)a ≠ 0 is assumed in every block below. Hence 2a ≠ 0 and 4a ≠ 0.convention, A11, A10

∎

Definition D2

If f(x₀) ≤ f(x) for every x, then f(x₀) is the minimum; if f(x) ≤ f(x₀) for every x, then f(x₀) is the maximum; and the point (x₀, f(x₀)) is called the vertex.

Proof.

The vertex is not the name of a shape but the single point where the value is smallest or largest.convention

∎

Lemma L1

For all u, v, (u + v)² = u² + 2uv + v²

Proof.

(1)(u + v)² = (u + v)(u + v)D1
(2)    = u(u + v) + v(u + v)(1), A1, A3
(3)    = (u² + uv) + (vu + v²)(2), A1
(4)vu = uvA3
(5)uv + uv = (1 + 1)uv = 2uvD1, A1, A3, A8
(6)(u + v)² = u² + 2uv + v²(3), (4), (5), A4, A5

∎

Lemma L2

For a ≠ 0, ax² + bx + c = a(x + b/2a)² + (c − b²/4a)

Proof.

(1)Set p = b/2a, q = c − b²/4a. Here 2a ≠ 0, 4a ≠ 0.D1
(2)a(x + p)² = a(x² + 2px + p²)L1, E
(3)     = ax² + a(2px) + ap²(2), A1
(4)a(2px) = (2ap)xA2, A3
(5)2ap = 2a(b/2a) = b(2a·(2a)⁻¹) = b(1), A2, A3, A9, A8
(6)4a(ap²) = (2a)(2a)(2a)⁻¹(2a)⁻¹b² = b² and 4a(b²/4a) = b²(1), D1, A2, A3, A9, A8
(7)4a ≠ 0, so ap² = b²/4a(6), (1), A13
(8)ap² + q = b²/4a + (c − b²/4a) = c(7), (1), A4, A5, A7, A6
(9)a(x + p)² + q = ax² + bx + c(3), (4), (5), (8), A4

∎

Theorem T1

If a > 0, then f attains its minimum c − b²/4a at x = −b/2a, and at every other x the value is larger.

Proof.

(1)Set p = b/2a, q = c − b²/4a, x₀ = −p.L2
(2)f(x₀) = a(x₀ + p)² + q = a × 0 + q = q(1), L2, A7, A12, A5, A6
(3)Suppose x ≠ x₀ and set t = x + p; then t ≠ 0.assumption, A4, A5, A6, A7
(4)f(x) = at² + q(3), L2
(5)0 < t²(3), A14
(6)0 < a, so 0 < at²assumption, (5), A15
(7)q < at² + q(6), A17, A6, A5
(8)Therefore f(x₀) < f(x)(2), (4), (7)
(9)This holds for every x ≠ x₀, so f(x₀) = q is the minimum.(8), (2), D2

∎

Theorem T2

If a < 0, then f attains its maximum c − b²/4a at x = −b/2a, and at every other x the value is smaller.

Proof.

(1)Set p = b/2a, q = c − b²/4a, x₀ = −p, and suppose x ≠ x₀.assumption, L2
(2)f(x₀) = q, and setting t = x + p gives t ≠ 0 and f(x) = at² + q(1), L2, A7, A12, A4, A5, A6
(3)0 < t²(2), A14
(4)a < 0, so at² < 0assumption, (3), A16
(5)at² + q < q(4), A17, A6, A5
(6)Therefore f(x) < f(x₀)(2), (5)
(7)This holds for every x ≠ x₀, so f(x₀) = q is the maximum.(6), (2), D2

∎

Corollary C

The vertex of the quadratic function f(x) = ax² + bx + c is (−b/2a, c − b²/4a).

Proof.

(1)If a > 0, f attains its minimum c − b²/4a at x = −b/2a.T1
(2)If a < 0, f attains its maximum c − b²/4a at x = −b/2a.T2
(3)Since a ≠ 0, these are the only two cases, and in either case the vertex is (−b/2a, c − b²/4a).(1), (2), D1, D2

∎

Remark

Can A14 be removed from this proof?

Separate the lines that rewrite the expression from the lines that compare values. Check whether they rest on the same axioms.