본문으로 바로 이동 / Skip to content

PROOF 66

Prove.

Why squares rather than absolute values

On finite data.

A way to read this proof

First separate what is assumed from what is to be proved. At each step, ask which definition or earlier result permits the move. If it is unclear, return to that premise rather than skipping to the conclusion.

Definition D1

The mean x̄ of data x₁, …, xₙ is the value satisfying n x̄ = Σxᵢ. With the data arranged in increasing order and n = 2m + 1, the middle value x₍ₘ₊₁₎ is called the median x̃.

Proof.

(1)Σaᵢ means a₁ + ⋯ + aₙ; u − v means u + (−v); u ≤ v means u < v or u = v.convention
(2)That the mean exists and is unique was obtained in Proof 64. Below we treat the case of odd n.convention

∎

Definition D2

If 0 ≤ t, set |t| = t; if t < 0, set |t| = −t. For a reference value c, set L(c) = Σ|xᵢ − c|, S(c) = Σ(xᵢ − c)².

Proof.

Both expressions are quantities with the signs of the deviations removed. Only the method of removal differs.convention

∎

Lemma L1

If a ≤ b, then for every c, |c − a| + |c − b| ≥ b − a, with equality exactly when a ≤ c ≤ b.

Proof.

(1)By trichotomy there are only three cases: c < a, a ≤ c ≤ b, b < c.assumption, A10
(2)If a ≤ c ≤ b, then |c − a| = c − a, |c − b| = b − c, so the sum is b − a.(1), D2, A1, A2, A3, A4
(3)Suppose c < a. Since a ≤ b, c < b, and |c − a| = a − c, |c − b| = b − c(1), A9, D2
(4)(a − c) + (b − c) = (b − a) + 2(a − c)(3), A1, A2, A3, A4, E
(5)Since c < a, 0 < a − c, and hence 0 < 2(a − c)(3), A7, A4, A8
(6)b − a < (b − a) + 2(a − c)(5), A7, A2, A3
(7)The case b < c gives, by the same method, b − a < (b − a) + 2(c − b)(1), D2, A1, A2, A3, A4, A7, A8, A9, E
(8)Combining the three cases, the inequality holds, with equality only in case (2).(2), (6), (7)

∎

Theorem T1

The c minimizing S(c) is the mean, and the c minimizing L(c) is the median. The choice of loss determines the choice of representative value.

Proof.

(1)The square side was obtained in Proof 65. The only c minimizing S(c) is x̄.A14, D2
(2)Now consider the absolute-value side. Suppose n = 2m + 1 and x₁ ≤ x₂ ≤ ⋯ ≤ xₙ.assumption, D1
(3)For k = 1, …, m, applying L1 with a = x_k, b = x_{n+1−k} gives |c − x_k| + |c − x_{n+1−k}| ≥ x_{n+1−k} − x_k, with equality exactly when x_k ≤ c ≤ x_{n+1−k}.(2), L1
(4)The remaining term is the single |c − x₍ₘ₊₁₎|. It is at least 0 and is 0 only when c = x₍ₘ₊₁₎.(2), D2, A10
(5)Setting K = Σ_{k≤m}(x_{n+1−k} − x_k), L(c) ≥ K + |c − x₍ₘ₊₁₎|(3), (4), D2, A7
(6)For every k ≤ m, x_k ≤ x₍ₘ₊₁₎ ≤ x_{n+1−k}, so at c = x₍ₘ₊₁₎ all the equalities in (3) hold and the remaining term is 0. That is, L(x₍ₘ₊₁₎) = K(2), (3), (4)
(7)If c ≠ x₍ₘ₊₁₎, then 0 < |c − x₍ₘ₊₁₎|, so K < K + |c − x₍ₘ₊₁₎| ≤ L(c)(4), (5), A7, A3, A2
(8)Therefore L(x̃) < L(c), and the only c minimizing L is the median x̃.(6), (7), D1
(9)If n is even, there is no remaining term and the equalities in (3) hold for every c between the two middle values, so the minimum is not attained at a single point.(3), (5)

∎

Theorem T2

For paired data (xᵢ, yᵢ), let dᵢ = xᵢ − x̄, eᵢ = yᵢ − ȳ. If Σdᵢeᵢ = 0, then the sum of squares of x + y is the sum of the sums of squares of x and of y.

Proof.

(1)Σ(xᵢ + yᵢ) = Σxᵢ + Σyᵢ = n x̄ + n ȳ = n(x̄ + ȳ), so the mean of x + y is x̄ + ȳ.A11, D1, A5, E
(2)(xᵢ + yᵢ) − (x̄ + ȳ) = dᵢ + eᵢ(1), A1, A2, A3, A4
(3)(dᵢ + eᵢ)² = dᵢ² + 2dᵢeᵢ + eᵢ²(2), A13
(4)Σ((xᵢ+yᵢ) − (x̄+ȳ))² = Σdᵢ² + 2Σdᵢeᵢ + Σeᵢ²(3), D2, A11, A12
(5)Suppose Σdᵢeᵢ = 0. Then the middle term is 0, so the sums of squares add exactly.assumption, (4), A3

∎

Theorem T3

Under the same condition, the sums of absolute values do not add.

Proof.

(1)Consider the data x = (1, 1, −1, −1), y = (1, −1, 1, −1). Since x̄ = ȳ = 0, dᵢ = xᵢ, eᵢ = yᵢ.D1, N
(2)Σdᵢeᵢ = 1 + (−1) + (−1) + 1 = 0, so this data satisfies the condition of T2.(1), N, T2
(3)x + y = (2, 0, 0, −2) and its mean is 0, so L_{x+y} = 2 + 0 + 0 + 2 = 4(1), D1, D2, N
(4)L_x = 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 4, L_y = 4, so L_x + L_y = 8(1), D2, N
(5)Since 4 ≠ 8, the sums of absolute values do not add.(3), (4), N
(6)For the same data, S_x = 4, S_y = 4, S_{x+y} = 4 + 0 + 0 + 4 = 8, so the sums of squares add.(1), D2, N, T2

∎

Theorem T4

f(t) = t² is differentiable at every t, but g(t) = |t| is not differentiable at t = 0.

Proof.

(1)(t²)′ = 2t, so f is differentiable at every t.A17
(2)g(0) = 0.D2
(3)If 0 < h, then (g(h) − g(0))·h⁻¹ = h·h⁻¹ = 1(2), D2, A19, A3
(4)If h < 0, then (g(h) − g(0))·h⁻¹ = (−h)·h⁻¹ = −(h·h⁻¹) = −1(2), D2, A6, A19, A3
(5)Adding −1 to both sides of 0 < 1 gives −1 < 0, and by transitivity −1 < 1, so by trichotomy 1 ≠ −1A18, A7, A2, A3, A4, A9, A10
(6)If the difference quotient approached a single value as h → 0, that value would have to be both 1 and −1.(3), (4), A16
(7)This contradicts (5), so the limit does not exist, and g is not differentiable at 0.(5), (6), A15
(8)Each term |c − xᵢ| of L(c) is likewise not differentiable at c = xᵢ, for the same reason.(7), D2

∎

Corollary C

Choosing between squares and absolute values is not a matter of right and wrong, but of what comes along with the choice.

Proof.

(1)Choosing squares makes the representative value the mean; choosing absolute values makes it the median.T1
(2)Choosing squares makes the spreads of two uncorrelated data sets add; with absolute values they do not add even under the same condition.T2, T3
(3)Choosing squares makes the loss differentiable at every point; choosing absolute values makes it non-differentiable at the data values.T4
(4)The data 1, 2, 3, 4, 100 have mean 22 and median 3.D1, N
(5)Changing 100 to 1000 makes the mean 202 while the median stays 3.D1, N
(6)Therefore, choosing absolute values keeps the representative value from moving even when one data point moves greatly.(4), (5), T1
(7)The two choices confer different properties. Neither replaces the other.(1), (2), (6)

∎

Remark

Can A16 be removed from this proof?

Count the reasons for choosing squares. Check what happens to the rest when one is removed.