본문으로 바로 이동 / Skip to content

PROOF 109

Prove.

The section formula

On the coordinate plane.

A way to read this proof

First separate what is assumed from what is to be proved. At each step, ask which definition or earlier result permits the move. If it is unclear, return to that premise rather than skipping to the conclusion.

Definition D1

For m > 0, n > 0, the point P dividing segment AB internally in the ratio m : n is the point on segment AB with AP : PB = m : n.

Proof.

(1)Set A = (x₁, y₁), B = (x₂, y₂), P = (x, y).convention
(2)AP : PB = m : n means n·AP = m·PB.convention

∎

Lemma L1

If x₁ ≠ x₂, then n(x − x₁) = m(x₂ − x)

Proof.

(1)Set A′ = (x₁, 0), P′ = (x, 0), B′ = (x₂, 0).convention
(2)AA′, PP′, BB′ are all vertical lines, hence parallel to one another.(1), A2
(3)The three parallels cut line AB and the x-axis, so A′P′ : P′B′ = AP : PB = m : n(2), A1, D1
(4)That is, n·A′P′ = m·P′B′(3), D1
(5)A′P′ = |x − x₁| and P′B′ = |x₂ − x|(1), A3
(6)P lies on segment AB, so x lies between x₁ and x₂, and x − x₁ and x₂ − x have the same sign.D1, A4
(7)Hence there is a single ε with |x − x₁| = ε(x − x₁), |x₂ − x| = ε(x₂ − x).(6), A5
(8)nε(x − x₁) = mε(x₂ − x) and ε ≠ 0, so n(x − x₁) = m(x₂ − x)(4), (5), (7), A15, A12, A10

∎

Lemma L2

If n(x − x₁) = m(x₂ − x), then x = (nx₁ + mx₂)/(m + n)

Proof.

(1)nx − nx₁ = mx₂ − mxassumption, A6, A9
(2)Adding mx + nx₁ to both sides gives nx + mx = nx₁ + mx₂(1), E, A7, A8, A9
(3)nx + mx = (n + m)x = (m + n)xA6, A7, A10
(4)Since m > 0 and n > 0, we have m + n > 0, and in particular m + n ≠ 0.D1, A14
(5)Multiplying both sides by 1/(m+n) gives x = (nx₁ + mx₂)/(m + n)(2), (3), (4), E, A13, A10, A11

∎

Theorem T1

The point dividing segment AB internally in the ratio m : n is P = ((nx₁ + mx₂)/(m+n), (ny₁ + my₂)/(m+n)).

Proof.

(1)If x₁ ≠ x₂, then x = (nx₁ + mx₂)/(m + n).L1, L2
(2)If x₁ = x₂, then P lies on segment AB, so x = x₁ = x₂.D1, A4
(3)In that case (nx₁ + mx₂)/(m + n) = (n + m)x₁/(m + n) = x₁, so the formula holds.(2), A6, A7, A10, A11, A13
(4)For the y-coordinate, drop to the y-axis instead of the x-axis and repeat the same argument.L1, L2
(5)Hence P = ((nx₁ + mx₂)/(m+n), (ny₁ + my₂)/(m+n)).(1), (2), (3), (4)

∎

Corollary C

If m = n = 1, then P = ((x₁+x₂)/2, (y₁+y₂)/2), and that point is the midpoint.

Proof.

(1)If m = n = 1, then m + n = 1 + 1 = 2.convention
(2)1×x₁ + 1×x₂ = x₁ + x₂, so x = (x₁ + x₂)/2, and likewise for y.(1), T1, A11
(3)AP : PB = 1 : 1, so AP = PB, and since P lies on the segment, it is the midpoint.D1, A11

∎

Remark

Can A1 be removed from this proof?

Separate the lines that carry the ratio over to coordinate differences from the lines that compute afterwards. Also check in which line m + n ≠ 0 is first needed.