본문으로 바로 이동 / Skip to content

PROOF 42

Prove.

The quotient rule

On differentiable functions.

A way to read this proof

First separate what is assumed from what is to be proved. At each step, ask which definition or earlier result permits the move. If it is unclear, return to that premise rather than skipping to the conclusion.

Definition D1

f is differentiable at x if the limit lim (h→0) [f(x+h) − f(x)]/h exists, and its value is written f′(x).

Proof.

(1)a − b means a + (−b), F/h means F · h⁻¹, and g² means g · g.convention
(2)If a limit exists, its value is unique. Hence the notation f′(x) is justified.A5

∎

Lemma L1

If g is differentiable at x and g(x) ≠ 0, then there exists δ > 0 such that g(x+h) ≠ 0 for all h with 0 < |h| < δ.

Proof.

(1)Since g is differentiable at x, lim (h→0) g(x+h) = g(x)assumption, A7
(2)Since g(x) ≠ 0, we have |g(x)| > 0.assumption, A9
(3)Take ε = |g(x)|. Then there is δ > 0 such that 0 < |h| < δ implies |g(x+h) − g(x)| < |g(x)|.(1), (2), A6
(4)If g(x+h) = 0, then |g(x+h) − g(x)| = |−g(x)| = |g(x)|, contradicting (3).(3), A9, A15
(5)Therefore 0 < |h| < δ implies g(x+h) ≠ 0.(4)

∎

Lemma L2

If g is differentiable at x and g(x) ≠ 0, then 1/g is differentiable at x and (1/g)′(x) = −g′(x)/g(x)².

Proof.

(1)Suppose g is differentiable at x and g(x) ≠ 0.assumption, D1
(2)If 0 < |h| < δ, then g(x+h) ≠ 0, and hence g(x+h)g(x) ≠ 0.L1, A17
(3)For such h, 1/g(x+h) − 1/g(x) = [g(x) − g(x+h)] · [g(x+h)g(x)]⁻¹ = −[g(x+h) − g(x)] · [g(x+h)g(x)]⁻¹(2), A18, A13, A11, A12, A14, A10, A16
(4)Multiplying both sides by h⁻¹ gives [1/g(x+h) − 1/g(x)]/h = −{[g(x+h) − g(x)]/h} · [g(x+h)g(x)]⁻¹(3), E, A11, A12, A16
(5)lim (h→0) [g(x+h) − g(x)]/h = g′(x)(1), D1
(6)lim (h→0) g(x+h) = g(x)(1), A7
(7)lim (h→0) [g(x+h)g(x)]⁻¹ = 1/[g(x)g(x)] = 1/g(x)² (the limit of the denominator is not 0)(6), A1, A4, A2
(8)Taking limits on both sides of (4) gives lim (h→0) [1/g(x+h) − 1/g(x)]/h = −g′(x) · 1/g(x)²(4), (5), (7), E, A1, A3
(9)Therefore (1/g)′(x) = −g′(x)/g(x)².(8), D1

∎

Theorem T1

If f and g are differentiable at x and g(x) ≠ 0, then f/g is differentiable at x and (f/g)′(x) = [f′(x)g(x) − f(x)g′(x)] / g(x)².

Proof.

(1)f/g means f · (1/g).convention
(2)By L2, 1/g is differentiable at x and (1/g)′ = −g′/g².L2
(3)Applying the product rule to f and 1/g gives (f · 1/g)′ = f′ · (1/g) + f · (1/g)′(1), (2), A8
(4)           = f′ · g⁻¹ + f · (−g′ · (g²)⁻¹)(3), (2)
(5)f′ · g⁻¹ = f′ · g · g⁻¹ · g⁻¹ = f′g · (g²)⁻¹A13, A11, A12, A14, A18
(6)Therefore (f/g)′ = [f′g − fg′] · (g²)⁻¹ = (f′g − fg′)/g².(4), (5), A10, A11, A12, A16

∎

Remark

Can A7 be removed from this proof?

The only assumption is g(x) ≠ 0. Yet (3) also divides by g(x+h). Check where the justification lies for that denominator being nonzero.