본문으로 바로 이동 / Skip to content

PROOF 196

Prove.

Without the parallel postulate there is no Pythagoras

On the Euclidean plane.

A way to read this proof

First separate what is assumed from what is to be proved. At each step, ask which definition or earlier result permits the move. If it is unclear, return to that premise rather than skipping to the conclusion.

Definition D1

In triangle ABC, let ∠C = 90°, and set a = BC, b = CA, c = AB.

Proof.

(1)The two sides enclosing the right angle are a and b, and the side opposite the right angle is c.convention
(2)When a line t cuts two lines, the two angles lying in opposite half-planes of t are called alternate angles.convention

∎

Lemma L1

If a line t cuts two parallel lines ℓ, m, the alternate angles are equal.

Proof.

(1)Suppose t cuts ℓ at P and m at Q, and ℓ ∥ m.assumption
(2)Call the alternate angle at P α, and the one at Q β.D1
(3)There is a unique line m′ through Q making alternate angle α with t.(2), A3
(4)The alternate angles are equal, so m′ ∥ ℓ(3), A2
(5)There is only one line through Q parallel to ℓ, so m′ = m(1), (4), A1
(6)Therefore β = α(3), (5), A3

∎

Theorem T1

The three interior angles of a triangle sum to 180°.

Proof.

(1)There is a unique line ℓ through the vertex A parallel to the line BC.A1
(2)Taking two points D, E on ℓ with A between them, the straight angle at A splits as ∠DAB + ∠BAC + ∠CAE = 180°. The details of the configuration are as in Proof 49.(1), A4, A5
(3)∠DAB and ∠ABC are alternate angles that the line AB makes with the parallels ℓ and BC, so ∠DAB = ∠ABC(1), (2), D1, L1
(4)∠CAE and ∠BCA are alternate angles made by the line AC, so ∠CAE = ∠BCA(1), (2), D1, L1
(5)∠ABC + ∠BAC + ∠BCA = 180°(2), (3), (4), E

∎

Theorem T2

If two triangles agree in two angles, they agree in the third, and therefore the two triangles are similar.

Proof.

(1)Suppose ∠A = ∠A′ and ∠B = ∠B′.assumption
(2)∠A + ∠B + ∠C = 180° and ∠A′ + ∠B′ + ∠C′ = 180°T1
(3)(∠A + ∠B) + ∠C = (∠A′ + ∠B′) + ∠C′(2), A12, E
(4)∠A + ∠B = ∠A′ + ∠B′(1), E
(5)∠C = ∠C′(3), (4), A13, E
(6)The three angles agree, so the corresponding sides are proportional. What supplied the third angle was the angle sum.(1), (5), A6

∎

Theorem T3

In the right triangle ABC, a² + b² = c²

Proof.

(1)(∠A + ∠B) + 90° = 90° + 90°, so ∠A + ∠B = 90°T1, D1, A12, A13, E, convention
(2)∠B > 0, so ∠A < 90°; and ∠A > 0, so ∠B < 90°. Both angles are acute.(1), A14
(3)Let H be the foot of the perpendicular from C to the line AB.A7
(4)H lies between A and B, so AH + HB = AB = c. Set AH = x, HB = y.(2), (3), A8, A9, D1
(5)In triangles AHC and ACB, ∠A is common and ∠AHC = ∠ACB = 90°(3), D1
(6)They agree in two angles, so the triangles are similar and AH : AC = AC : AB, that is, x/b = b/c(5), T2, D1
(7)b > 0 and c > 0, so b² = c · x(6), A10, A12, A15
(8)In triangles BHC and BCA, ∠B is common and ∠BHC = ∠BCA = 90°, so the same argument gives a² = c · y(3), D1, T2, A10, A12, A15
(9)a² + b² = c·y + c·x = c(y + x)(7), (8), A11, E
(10)y + x = x + y = c, so a² + b² = c · c = c²(4), (9), A12, E

∎

Statement C

In a plane where the fifth postulate fails, a² + b² = c² does not hold.

(1)The equation was obtained at the end of the chain T1 → T2 → T3, and the first link of the chain is A1.T1, T2, T3
(2)That the equation fails in a plane denying A1 is not proved here and is left as a statement. The circumstances of that plane are treated in Proof 59.convention

Proof omitted.

Remark

Can A1 be removed from this chain?

No parallel line appears in the statement of any of the three theorems. Trace what each theorem cites back to the first link.