본문으로 바로 이동 / Skip to content

PROOF 134

Prove.

The left and right derivatives must agree

On real functions.

A way to read this proof

First separate what is assumed from what is to be proved. At each step, ask which definition or earlier result permits the move. If it is unclear, return to that premise rather than skipping to the conclusion.

Definition D1

f is differentiable at x means that the limit lim (h→0) [f(x+h) − f(x)]/h exists, and its value is written f′(x).

Proof.

(1)a − b means a + (−b), and F/h means F · h⁻¹. The difference quotient is defined only for h ≠ 0.convention
(2)If the limit exists, its value is unique. Therefore the notation f′(x) is justified.A2

∎

Definition D2

The h → 0− limit of the difference quotient is called the left derivative f′−(x), and the h → 0+ limit the right derivative f′+(x).

Proof.

Each is the limit obtained by sending h to 0 from one side only. It means two things together: that the one-sided limit exists, and what its value is.convention

∎

Theorem T1

f is differentiable at x if and only if f′−(x) and f′+(x) both exist and are equal, in which case f′(x) is their common value.

Proof.

(1)For h ≠ 0, let Q(h) = [f(x+h) − f(x)]/h.convention, D1
(2)f being differentiable at x means that lim (h→0) Q(h) exists.(1), D1
(3)That limit exists if and only if the left and right limits both exist and are equal.(2), A1
(4)The left limit of Q is f′−(x) and the right limit is f′+(x).(1), D2
(5)Therefore f being differentiable at x is equivalent to f′−(x) = f′+(x).(2), (3), (4)
(6)The limit value is unique, so that single common value is f′(x).(5), A2, D1

∎

Corollary C1

g(x) = |x| is not differentiable at 0, because the left and right derivatives differ.

Proof.

(1)|t| means t if t ≥ 0 and −t if t < 0. Therefore |0| = 0 and 0 + h = h.convention, A20, A22
(2)If h > 0, then [g(0+h) − g(0)]/h = h · h⁻¹ = 1.(1), A20, A21, A22, A14
(3)If h < 0, then [g(0+h) − g(0)]/h = (−h) · h⁻¹ = (−1)(h · h⁻¹) = −1.(1), A19, A16, A14, A18
(4)The difference quotient is the constant 1 for h > 0 and the constant −1 for h < 0, so f′+(0) = 1, f′−(0) = −1.(2), (3), A3, D2
(5)1 ≠ −1, so the two values differ, and g is not differentiable at 0.(4), A23, T1

∎

Corollary C2

The difference quotient of g(x) = x^(1/3) at 0 is positive on both sides, yet g is not differentiable at 0.

Proof.

(1)x^(1/3) means the real number s with s³ = x, and there is exactly one such s. Therefore g(0) = 0.convention, A5
(2)If h ≠ 0 and u = h^(1/3), then h = u³ and u ≠ 0.(1)
(3)Q(h) = [g(0+h) − g(0)]/h = u · (u³)⁻¹ = u · u⁻¹(u²)⁻¹ = (u²)⁻¹(2), A20, A21, A22, A15, A16, A14, A18
(4)u ≠ 0, so 0 < u², and therefore Q(h) = (u²)⁻¹ > 0, regardless of the sign of h.(3), A9, A6
(5)The sign of the difference quotient is the same on both sides. What splits here is not the sign.(4)
(6)Suppose lim (h→0) Q(h) exists. Then there are δ > 0 and M > 0 with Q(h) ≤ M for every h with 0 < |h| < δ.assumption, A4, (4)
(7)0 < M⁻¹, so s = min(δ, M⁻¹, 1) is positive. Let u = s/2; then 0 < u < δ, u < M⁻¹, u < 1.(6), A6, A10, A11, A12
(8)0 < u < 1, so u² = u · u < u · 1 = u, and for the same reason u³ < u².(7), A7, A17, A18
(9)Let h = u³; then 0 < h < u < δ, so h lies in the range of (6).(7), (8), A12
(10)u² < u < M⁻¹, and multiplying both sides by the positive number M(u²)⁻¹ gives M < (u²)⁻¹ = Q(h).(3), (7), (8), A12, A7, A8, A6, A14, A16, A17, A18, E
(11)(6) says Q(h) ≤ M. This cannot hold together with M < Q(h).(6), (9), (10), A13
(12)Therefore lim (h→0) Q(h) does not exist, and g is not differentiable at 0.(11), D1

∎

Remark

Can A1 be removed from this proof?

T1 exchanges differentiability for a condition on the two one-sided limits. Check what licenses that exchange. Also check whether C2 uses it.