본문으로 바로 이동 / Skip to content

PROOF 143

Prove.

Integration by parts is the product rule read backwards

On a closed interval.

A way to read this proof

First separate what is assumed from what is to be proved. At each step, ask which definition or earlier result permits the move. If it is unclear, return to that premise rather than skipping to the conclusion.

Definition D1

G is an antiderivative of h on an interval if G′ = h at every point of that interval.

Proof.

(1)This definition does not assert that such a G exists. If one exists, it is so named.convention

∎

Definition D2

The indefinite integral ∫h(x)dx of h denotes the collection of all antiderivatives of h. If G is one of them, write ∫h(x)dx = G(x) + C, where C stands for an arbitrary constant.

Proof.

(1)For any constant c, (G + c)′ = G′ = h, so G + c is also an antiderivative.A4, D1
(2)Conversely, if H is an antiderivative, then H′ = G′, so H − G is a constant.D1, A3
(3)Hence the antiderivatives are exactly those of the form G + C. Both sides of the equation are collections of functions, not functions.(1), (2)

∎

Lemma L1

If f and g are differentiable and H is an antiderivative of f′g, then (fg − H)′ = fg′.

Proof.

(1)By the product rule, (fg)′ = f′g + fg′.assumption, A1
(2)(fg − H)′ = (fg)′ − H′.A2
(3)H is an antiderivative of f′g, so H′ = f′g.assumption, D1
(4)(fg − H)′ = (f′g + fg′) − f′g = fg′(1), (2), (3), A10, E

∎

Theorem T1

If f and g are differentiable and f′g has an antiderivative, then ∫ f(x)g′(x) dx = f(x)g(x) − ∫ f′(x)g(x) dx.

Proof.

(1)Let H be an antiderivative of f′g.assumption, D1
(2)(fg − H)′ = fg′, so fg − H is an antiderivative of fg′.(1), L1, D1
(3)Hence the left side ∫fg′dx is the collection of all functions of the form f(x)g(x) − H(x) + C.(2), D2
(4)∫f′g dx is the collection of all functions of the form H(x) + C.(1), D2
(5)Therefore the right side f(x)g(x) − ∫f′g dx is the collection of all functions of the form f(x)g(x) − H(x) − C.(4), A10
(6)As C runs over all constants, so does −C, so (3) and (5) are the same collection.(3), (5), A10
(7)Hence the constant of integration is written only once. Writing one on each side uses the same arbitrariness twice.(6), D2

∎

Theorem T2

If f and g are differentiable and f′ and g′ are continuous on [a,b], then ∫ₐᵇ f g′ = f(b)g(b) − f(a)g(a) − ∫ₐᵇ f′ g.

Proof.

(1)f and g are differentiable, hence continuous, so f′g and fg′ are continuous on [a,b] and integrable.assumption, A9, A7, A8
(2)H(x) = ∫ₐˣ f′g is an antiderivative of f′g.(1), A5, D1
(3)By L1, fg − H is an antiderivative of fg′.(2), L1, D1
(4)By the fundamental theorem, ∫ₐᵇ fg′ = (fg − H)(b) − (fg − H)(a).(1), (3), A6
(5)H′ = f′g, so by the fundamental theorem, ∫ₐᵇ f′g = H(b) − H(a).(1), (2), A6
(6)Expanding (4) gives ∫ₐᵇ fg′ = f(b)g(b) − f(a)g(a) − (H(b) − H(a)).(4), A10
(7)Substituting (5) gives ∫ₐᵇ fg′ = f(b)g(b) − f(a)g(a) − ∫ₐᵇ f′g.(5), (6), E
(8)The arbitrary constant of T1 is absent here, because taking the difference of two antiderivative values makes the constant vanish.T1, (4), (6), A10

∎

Remark

Can A1 be removed from this proof?

A1 is used exactly once, in line (1) of L1. Without that line, check what there is left to move across the equation.