본문으로 바로 이동 / Skip to content

PROOF 104

Prove.

An inequality cannot be squared without a condition

On an ordered field.

A way to read this proof

First separate what is assumed from what is to be proved. At each step, ask which definition or earlier result permits the move. If it is unclear, return to that premise rather than skipping to the conclusion.

Definition D1

b − a means b + (−a).

Proof.

Subtraction is not a new operation but the addition of an inverse.convention

∎

Definition D2

|a| means a when 0 ≤ a, and −a when a < 0.

Proof.

Trichotomy guarantees that exactly one of the two cases occurs.A1

∎

Lemma L1

a < b if and only if 0 < b − a.

Proof.

(1)Suppose a < b.assumption
(2)a + (−a) < b + (−a)(1), A3
(3)0 < b − a(2), A6, D1
(4)Conversely, suppose 0 < b − a.assumption
(5)0 + a < (b + (−a)) + a(4), A3, D1
(6)(b + (−a)) + a = b + ((−a) + a) = bA7, A8, A6, A5
(7)0 + a = aA8, A5
(8)a < b(5), (6), (7)

∎

Lemma L2

(b − a)(b + a) = b² − a²

Proof.

(1)(b + (−a))(b + a) = b(b + a) + (−a)(b + a)A9, A10, D1
(2)b(b + a) = b² + baA9
(3)(−a)(b + a) = (−(ab)) + (−(a²))A9, A11
(4)left side = b² + (ba + (−(ab))) + (−(a²))(1), (2), (3), A7
(5)Since ba = ab, we have ba + (−(ab)) = 0A10, A6
(6)(b − a)(b + a) = b² + 0 + (−(a²)) = b² − a²(4), (5), A5, D1

∎

Lemma L3

|a|² = a²

Proof.

(1)If 0 ≤ a, then |a| = a, so |a|² = a².D2
(2)If a < 0, then |a| = −a, so |a|² = (−a)(−a) = a².D2, A12
(3)These are the only two cases, so |a|² = a² always.(1), (2), A1

∎

Lemma L4

0 ≤ |a|

Proof.

(1)If 0 ≤ a, then |a| = a, so 0 ≤ |a|.D2
(2)Suppose a < 0.assumption
(3)a + (−a) < 0 + (−a)(2), A3
(4)The left side is 0 and the right side is −a, so 0 < −a = |a|.(3), A6, A8, A5, D2
(5)These are the only two cases, so 0 ≤ |a| always.(1), (4), A1

∎

Theorem T1

a² < b² does not follow from a < b.

Proof.

(1)Set a = −3, b = 2. Then −3 < 2.N1
(2)a² = (−3)² = 9 and b² = 2² = 4.N2
(3)Since 4 < 9, we have b² < a².(2), N1
(4)By trichotomy, a² < b² does not hold.(3), A1
(5)Hence a < b alone cannot yield a² < b².(1), (4)

∎

Theorem T2

If 0 ≤ a and a < b, then a² < b²

Proof.

(1)Suppose 0 ≤ a and a < b.assumption
(2)0 < b − a(1), L1
(3)If 0 = a, then a + b = 0 + b = b and 0 < b, so 0 < a + b(1), A8, A5
(4)If 0 < a, then 0 < b and 0 + a < b + a, so 0 < a < a + b(1), A2, A3, A8, A5
(5)In either case, 0 < a + b(3), (4), A1
(6)0 < (b − a)(b + a)(2), (5), A8, A4
(7)(b − a)(b + a) = b² − a²L2
(8)0 < b² − a²(6), (7), E
(9)a² < b²(8), L1

∎

Corollary C

|a| < |b| if and only if a² < b².

Proof.

(1)Suppose |a| < |b|.assumption
(2)Since 0 ≤ |a|, we have |a|² < |b|²(1), L4, T2
(3)Since |a|² = a² and |b|² = b², we have a² < b²(2), L3, E
(4)Conversely, suppose a² < b².assumption
(5)If |b| < |a|, the same argument gives b² < a²L4, T2, L3
(6)Then a² < b² and b² < a² hold together, contradicting trichotomy.(4), (5), A1
(7)If |a| = |b|, then a² = b², which contradicts (4) and trichotomy.(4), L3, E, A1
(8)By trichotomy, |a| < |b|.(6), (7), A1

∎

Remark

Can A4 be removed from this proof?

In the proof of T2, check the sign of each of the two factors. One follows directly from the hypothesis; the other does not.