본문으로 바로 이동 / Skip to content

PROOF 195

Prove.

There are only five regular polyhedra

On convex polyhedra.

A way to read this proof

First separate what is assumed from what is to be proved. At each step, ask which definition or earlier result permits the move. If it is unclear, return to that premise rather than skipping to the conclusion.

Definition D1

A regular polyhedron is a convex polyhedron all of whose faces are congruent regular p-gons, with q faces meeting at every vertex. Let V be the number of vertices, E the number of edges, and F the number of faces.

Proof.

(1)A polygon has at least 3 sides, so p ≥ 3convention
(2)With only 2 faces at a vertex no solid angle forms. Therefore q ≥ 3convention
(3)Around a vertex, faces and edges alternate. A vertex where q faces meet also has q edges meeting.convention

∎

Lemma L1

pF = 2E

Proof.

(1)Count all pairs (f, e) of a face and one of its edges. There are F faces and each face has p edges, so there are pF pairs.D1
(2)Count the same pairs from the edge side. There are E edges and each edge touches exactly 2 faces, so there are 2E pairs.A2
(3)The same set was counted in two ways. pF = 2E(1), (2), E

∎

Lemma L2

qV = 2E

Proof.

(1)Count all pairs (v, e) of a vertex and an edge meeting it. There are V vertices and q edges meet at each, so there are qV pairs.D1
(2)Count the same pairs from the edge side. There are E edges and each edge has exactly 2 end vertices, so there are 2E pairs.A3
(3)qV = 2E(1), (2), E

∎

Theorem T1

1/p + 1/q = 1/2 + 1/E, and therefore 1/p + 1/q > 1/2

Proof.

(1)p ≥ 3 > 0 and q ≥ 3 > 0, so V = 2E/q and F = 2E/pL1, L2, D1, E, N
(2)Substitute into Euler's formula. 2E/q − E + 2E/p = 2A1, (1), E
(3)E > 0, so divide both sides by 2E. 1/q − 1/2 + 1/p = 1/E(2), A4, E, N
(4)1/p + 1/q = 1/2 + 1/E(3), E, N
(5)E > 0, so 1/E > 0, and therefore 1/p + 1/q > 1/2(4), A4, A7, N

∎

Theorem T2

The integer solutions with p ≥ 3, q ≥ 3, 1/p + 1/q > 1/2 are exactly the five pairs (3,3), (3,4), (4,3), (3,5), (5,3).

Proof.

(1)Suppose p ≥ 6. Since q ≥ 3, 1/p ≤ 1/6, 1/q ≤ 1/3 and 1/p + 1/q ≤ 1/6 + 1/3 = 1/2D1, A5, A6, N
(2)This contradicts T1. Therefore p ≤ 5(1), T1
(3)Applying the same argument to q gives q ≤ 5D1, A5, A6, T1, N
(4)Therefore p and q are each one of 3, 4, 5, and there are nine candidate pairs.D1, (2), (3)
(5)(4,4) gives 1/4 + 1/4 = 1/2, which is not greater than 1/2. Excluded.(4), T1, N
(6)(4,5) and (5,4) give 1/4 + 1/5 = 9/20 < 1/2. Excluded.(4), T1, N
(7)(5,5) gives 1/5 + 1/5 = 2/5 < 1/2. Excluded.(4), T1, N
(8)Verify the remaining five pairs. (3,3): 2/3, (3,4) and (4,3): 7/12, (3,5) and (5,3): 8/15 — all greater than 1/2.(4), (5), (6), (7), N

∎

Corollary C

For each of the five pairs, E, V, and F are uniquely determined.

Proof.

(1)From the equation of T1, 1/E = 1/p + 1/q − 1/2, and the right side is positive, so E is determined uniquely as its reciprocal.T1, E, N
(2)Once E is determined, V = 2E/q and F = 2E/p are determined with it.(1), L1, L2, N
(3)(3,3): 1/E = 2/3 − 1/2 = 1/6. E = 6, V = 12/3 = 4, F = 12/3 = 4(1), (2), N
(4)(3,4): 1/E = 7/12 − 6/12 = 1/12. E = 12, V = 24/4 = 6, F = 24/3 = 8(1), (2), N
(5)(4,3): 1/E = 1/12. E = 12, V = 24/3 = 8, F = 24/4 = 6(1), (2), N
(6)(3,5): 1/E = 16/30 − 15/30 = 1/30. E = 30, V = 60/5 = 12, F = 60/3 = 20(1), (2), N
(7)(5,3): 1/E = 1/30. E = 30, V = 60/3 = 20, F = 60/5 = 12(1), (2), N
(8)These five are called, in order, the tetrahedron, octahedron, cube, icosahedron, and dodecahedron.(3), (4), (5), (6), (7), convention

∎

Remark

Can A1 be removed from this proof?

This proof accepts Euler's formula as an axiom without proving it. Find which part of the conclusion that one line supports.