본문으로 바로 이동 / Skip to content

PROOF 125

Prove.

The maximum and minimum come from the vertex

On the real numbers ℝ.

A way to read this proof

First separate what is assumed from what is to be proved. At each step, ask which definition or earlier result permits the move. If it is unclear, return to that premise rather than skipping to the conclusion.

Definition D1

If f(p) ≤ f(x) for every x, then f(p) is called the minimum of f and p a minimum point. If f(x) ≤ f(p) for every x, then f(p) is called the maximum and p a maximum point.

Proof.

(1)u ≤ v means u < v or u = v.convention
(2)The minimum is a value below which no x produces a smaller value, and a minimum point is a point actually attaining that value.convention

∎

Definition D2

If f(p) < f(x) for every x with x ≠ p, then p is called the unique minimum point. The unique maximum point is defined the same way.

Proof.

The definition of a minimum point allows equality; the definition of a unique minimum point requires the inequality to be strict at every other point.convention

∎

Lemma L1

If f(x) = ax² + bx + c (a ≠ 0) and p = −b/2a, q = c − b²/4a, then for every x, f(x) − f(p) = a(x − p)²

Proof.

(1)x − p means x + (−p).convention
(2)f(x) = a(x − p)² + qA1
(3)p − p = 0, so f(p) = a × 0 + q = 0 + q = q(2), A10, A11, A8, A9
(4)f(x) − f(p) = (a(x−p)² + q) + (−q) = a(x−p)² + (q + (−q))(2), (3), A7
(5)q + (−q) = 0, so f(x) − f(p) = a(x−p)²(4), A10, A9

∎

Lemma L2

If x ≠ p, then 0 < (x − p)²

Proof.

(1)If x − p = 0, adding p to both sides gives x = p.A7, A8, A9, A10
(2)x ≠ p, so x − p ≠ 0.assumption, (1)
(3)0 < (x − p)²(2), A2

∎

Theorem T1

If a > 0, then f(p) is the minimum of f, and p is the unique minimum point.

Proof.

(1)Suppose a > 0, and let x ≠ p.assumption
(2)0 < (x − p)²(1), L2
(3)0 < a, so 0 < a(x − p)²(1), (2), A3
(4)a(x − p)² = f(x) − f(p)L1
(5)0 < f(x) − f(p)(3), (4)
(6)Adding f(p) to both sides gives f(p) < f(x)(5), A5, A7, A8, A9, A10
(7)If x = p, then f(p) = f(x).convention
(8)f(p) ≤ f(x) for every x, so f(p) is the minimum and p is a minimum point.(6), (7), D1
(9)The inequality is strict at every x ≠ p, so p is the unique minimum point.(6), D2
(10)If r ≠ p were also a minimum point, then f(r) ≤ f(p), but (6) gives f(p) < f(r). This contradicts trichotomy, so p is the only minimum point.(6), D1, A6

∎

Corollary C

If a < 0, then f(p) is the maximum of f, and p is the unique maximum point.

Proof.

(1)Suppose a < 0, and let x ≠ p.assumption
(2)0 < (x − p)²(1), L2
(3)a < 0, so a(x − p)² < 0(1), (2), A4
(4)a(x − p)² = f(x) − f(p), so f(x) − f(p) < 0(3), L1
(5)Adding f(p) to both sides gives f(x) < f(p)(4), A5, A7, A8, A9, A10
(6)If x = p, then f(x) = f(p), so f(x) ≤ f(p) for every x, and f(p) is the maximum.(5), convention, D1
(7)The inequality is strict at every x ≠ p, so p is the unique maximum point.(5), D2

∎

Remark

Can A2 be removed from this proof?

Separate the lines that compute the difference from the lines that judge its sign. They do not rest on the same axiom.