본문으로 바로 이동 / Skip to content
Contents/Frequency & Histograms

▁▃▇ · Frequency & Histograms

Bin them, and the distribution's shape rises out of the pile.

A roster of 25 classmates' heights — does reading 25 numbers reveal the class?

Consider bin width together with frequency.

Two data sets, same average, utterly different faces.

Open the immersive version →

Why does this question matter?

Thirty test scores, 25 heights, a thousand customer ages — data arrives as piles of individual numbers, and reading them yields no judgment.

The fix: choose intervals (classes) and count how many fall in each (frequency). As a table it's a frequency table; as bars, a histogram — the pile becomes a shape.

Once the shape shows, questions become possible: where does it cluster (center), how wide (spread), is it lopsided (skew)? Statistical thinking starts here.

Pause and try it yourself

Make a prediction first. Change one input at a time and compare what happens with what you expected.

Predict first — read the roster of 25 classmates' heights (25 raw numbers). Does the class's character show at a glance?

Bin the roster

Below is the actual roster. Press to bin into 5cm classes and count.

142145147148150151152152153154155155156157157158159160161162163164166168169

Read the idea from another angle

A histogram is the data's face.

A mean is just the data's address; the histogram shows the whole visage. Two groups with equal means can wear utterly different faces — the habit of looking at distributions is half of statistics.

Bin width is resolution.

Too narrow and you see only jagged noise; too wide and features smear away. The same data tells different stories at different widths — choosing the width IS analysis.

Now read the definitions with their conditions

What the height-roster experiment confirmed, in mathematical language.

Class and frequency

A class is a bin holding data; frequency counts what falls inside — their table is the frequency table.

Relative frequency

Frequency divided by the total — the common language for comparing groups of different sizes. Always sums to 1.

The histogram

The frequency table drawn — the bars' silhouette is the distribution's shape (bell, skew, peaks).

Make one more distinction

Binning loses information, so it's a loss.

You lose individual values but gain the more important thing: the distribution's shape. Where the data clusters and how it spreads never shows in a roster — summarizing is translation, not loss.

The group with the taller bar has the higher share in that class too.

With different group sizes, comparing counts is meaningless. 7 of 25 (28%) beats 20 of 100 (20%) in share — groups compare by relative frequency, not frequency.

Where else can this idea help?

Score distributions

'Average 72' says little. Draw the histogram and you see whether it's twin-peaked (studied vs gave up) or bell-shaped — why teachers read distributions before averages.

Population pyramids

Two age histograms (male/female) in 5-year bins, placed back to back — aging societies read off a single shape.

Camera exposure histograms

A photo app's histogram is the frequency distribution of pixel brightness. Piled to the right means overexposed — photographers read one per shot.

Game rank distributions

An online game's tier chart is a histogram of player skill. Where you sit on the bell is your percentile.

Explain it in your own words

Try another question
Q1Which heights belong to the class [155, 160)? Does 160 count?Show answer ▾

155 up to but not including 160 — 160 goes to the next class [160, 165). The 'from-inclusive, to-exclusive' agreement keeps boundary values from being counted twice.

Q2If 6 of 25 students fall in [150,155), what's the relative frequency?Show answer ▾

6 ÷ 25 = 0.24 (24%). All relative frequencies sum to exactly 1 — a built-in check.

Q3What happens to the histogram with very narrow (1cm) bins?Show answer ▾

Nearly 25 scattered, jagged bars — the shape dissolves. Too wide (30cm) and everything smears into one bar. A moderate width keeps the shape alive — width choice is part of the analysis.

Try answering yourself before revealing it — getting it wrong is where learning starts.

What question comes next?

Previous concept

x̄

Averages

Feel one number's limits (the mean) and the need for shape (distribution) appears.

← Averages lab

Leads to next

▭

Box Plots

Another portrait — summarizing a distribution in five numbers instead of the full shape. The weapon of group comparison.

Go to the Box Plots lab →

Related lab

x̄

Averages

Summarizing the center in one number — complete only alongside the shape.

Go to the Averages lab →

Related lab

N(0,1)

Distributions

Smooth the histogram and the normal curve emerges.

Go to the Distributions lab →