The 'average annual return' hiding in every fund ad.
A 50% cumulative return over 3 years — is the annual average 50÷3 ≈ 16.7%?
Growth stacks by multiplication — unwinding a cumulative return into a yearly rate takes a root (the geometric mean), not division.
Experiment
Hands-on experiment
Predict first — a 50% cumulative return over 3 years. The annual average?
Roll both answers for 3 years
Starting with $1,000 — which one lands exactly on $1,500?
Read more — why it exists · insights · common mistakes · formulasExpand ▾
Why
Why does this exist?
'50% in 3 years, so 16.7% a year' feels natural — and is wrong. Compound 16.7% for 3 years and you get 58.9%, because returns multiply; they don't add.
What multiplication built, multiplication must unwind: solve (1+r)³ = 1.5, i.e., the cube root of 1.5 minus 1 = 14.5% per year. That is the Compound Annual Growth Rate.
Fund ads, company earnings, channel growth — wherever 'average annual %' appears, the arithmetic-vs-geometric gap decides your judgment. The bigger the swings, the bigger the gap.
Misconception
Common misconceptions
Cumulative return ÷ years = annual average return.
Growth compounds (multiplies), so division always overestimates. Roll 50%÷3 = 16.7% for three years and you get 58.9% — the true answer is ³√1.5 − 1 = 14.5%.
Alternating +50% and −50% averages 0% — break-even.
1.5 × 0.5 = 0.75 — a 25% loss. The arithmetic mean is 0%, but the geometric mean is √0.75 − 1 ≈ −13.4%/yr. Volatility itself eats returns — the 'volatility tax'.
Formula
Writing it as math
What the verification experiment confirmed, formalized.
Definition of CAGR
The n-th root of the total multiple over n years — asking 'if growth had been steady, what rate was it?'
Compound growth, the original
CAGR is this equation solved backwards for r. Compounding (powers) and CAGR (roots) are a matched pair.
Rule of 72
6% doubles in ~12 years; 9% in ~8. An approximation born from ln 2 ≈ 0.693 — CAGR for mental math.
In Real Life
Where you meet it in real life
Reading fund and ETF ads
'120% cumulative return' means nothing without the period. Over 10 years that's 8.2% CAGR — converting the big headline number to a yearly rate is verification step one.
Company earnings and growth stocks
'Revenue CAGR 25%' means doubling roughly every 3 years (Rule of 72). The growth language of investment reports is CAGR throughout.
National growth rates
3% annual growth doubles GDP in 24 years. Economies that once grew 7% a year doubled every decade.
The volatility tax
An asset alternating +30% and −20% has a +5% arithmetic mean but only ~+2% CAGR. The wilder the swings, the further the geometric mean falls below the arithmetic — why steady returns are underrated.
Math Behind
The math behind this
Related lab
Powers
Compounding is a power; CAGR is its inverse (a root) — exponent sense IS return sense.
Go to the Powers lab →Connection
Labs connect
Previous lab
Compound Interest
Meet multiplicative growth (compounding) first, and CAGR — its unwinding — makes sense.
← Compound Interest labRecommended next
Expected Value
You've measured return's speed; now weigh uncertain returns' center of gravity.
Go to the Expected Value lab →